Systematic review explores information extraction challenges and proposes a framework for PDF systems.
Introduction Automating the extraction of information from Portable Document Format (PDF) documents represents a major advancement in information extraction, with applications in various domains such as healthcare, law, or biochemistry. However, existing solutions face challenges related to accuracy, domain adaptability, and implementation complexity. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to examine approaches and trends in PDF information extraction and storage approaches. Results The review revealed three dominant methodological categories: rule-based systems, statistical learning models, and neural network-based approaches. Key limitations include the rigidity of rule-based methods, the lack of annotated domain-specific datasets for learning-based approaches, and issues such as hallucinations in large language models. Discussion To overcome these limitations, a conceptual framework is proposed comprising nine core components: project manager, document manager, document pre-processor, ontology manager, information extractor, annotation engine, question-answering tool, knowledge visualizer, and data exporter. This framework aims to improve the accuracy, adaptability, and usability of PDF information extraction systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atagong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: