Empirical study evaluates mixed reality's effects on listening comprehension and oral expression in English education, suggesting enhanced personalized learning opportunities.
This study focuses on the application and impact of mixed reality (MR) technology in English communicative competence training. Through an empirical study of MR technology, it explores how it can simulate real English communicative situations in order to promote the enhancement of listening, reading, writing, and speaking skills. The results of the study show that MR technology shows significant advantages in improving students’ listening comprehension and oral expression, and its personalized learning path and adaptive scenario design provide strong support for meeting students’ individual needs and development. In the process of implementation, the application architecture of MR technology includes advanced hardware equipment, software platform, stable and efficient network environment, and rich content resource library, which work together to build a highly immersive learning environment, realize personalized learning path setting, dynamic scene adaptation, analysis of in-depth learning data, and personalized feedback loops, so as to create an innovative English learning practice platform. Through well-designed experimental evaluations, the study confirms that the effectiveness of English communicative competence training using MR technology is superior to that of traditional teaching methods. MR technology shows obvious advantages in multiple dimensions such as listening comprehension, oral expression, use of communicative strategies, and the cultivation of cross-cultural communicative awareness. This research reveals the innovative role of MR technology in the reform of English education, and indicates that it has a broad application prospect and potential value in the future education research, which will lead the education field to develop in the direction of higher efficiency, stronger personalization and more fun.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: