Analytical syntactic approach reveals the relationship between case-marking and thematic roles in Arabic.
Dialectal tanwīn and nom-case in Classical Arabic are compared for the first time from within an analytical syntactic approach. acc /non- nom -marking as manifest through the former is argued to reflect the same focus expressed through nom -distribution within the Classical system. The nom -to- acc shift within the dialectal system is hypothesised to have developed as part of a drive towards a more canonical correspondence between case -marking and thematic-role, giving rise to a differential subj -marking system. In revisiting nom-case marking in Classical/Standard Arabic, the study concentrates on those instances where nom-case marks what is here analysed as obj , and what that is implicative of in the grammar. The study adds further to the literature which claims that Arabic is a discourse-configured language and specifically argues that case in the Classical/Quranic and Medieval dialectal Arabic systems is understood as an in situ discourse function index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maris Camilleri (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: