Quantitative study explores cognitive biases in decision-making among employees in Singapore, indicating gaps in existing theories.
This paper shows the research framework and hypothesis development for a quantitative study on heuristics andbiases in employee decision-making in Singaporean workplaces. The underlying theories used are the BoundedRationality and Prospect Theories. This study addresses research gaps previously identified by a systematic literaturereview (Ohms, 2025b), particularly focusing on non-investment contexts and Singapore. The study identifiesoverconfidence, herding, and decision avoidance biases as the independent variables; information evaluation,searching information, and procrastination as the dependent variables; and time pressure and complexity as themoderating variables. These hypotheses establish a rigorous theoretical foundation for investigating the specifiedrelationships, contributing to new knowledge in behavioural economics and organisational practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin Ohms (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: