The term “sect” in the non-religious information space: the problem of definition

The aim of the research is to clarify the definition of the term “sect” and the limits of its use in the modern information space. The article raises an important question: how correct is it to use the term “sect” in relation to non-religious social associations that have their own doctrine, practice, and special methods of interaction with participants. The transformation of this term in its meaning and its perception by society is analyzed. Considering the trends in the development of information technologies in the 21st century and the diversity of religious views in Russia, the problem raised in the article requires rethinking. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the author presents the term “sect” as permissible when used in religious studies, but unacceptable for denoting social groups with deviant behavior, as this further blurs the unstable boundaries of this conceptual apparatus. The necessity of taking into account that the widespread use of the term “sect” distorts its semantic load and creates prerequisites for it to finally leave the section of theology and cease to be associated with religious groups is emphasized. As a result of the study, it was determined that at this stage of using the term “sect”, it is premature to assert that it has expanded into a more universal concept describing the structures and dynamics of group interactions. However, this transformation is possible with changes in social, cultural, and religious contexts and will depend on modern trends in society. In conclusion, the idea is substantiated that the term “sect” must be used in a religious sense, because it primarily relates to the spiritual sphere.