Qualitative study uncovers leadership strategies and challenges for technology integration in higher education, highlighting cultural context.
This qualitative study explores how educational leadership practices facilitate the integration of technology in higher education, using universities in Heilongjiang province, China as a contextual example. Through a case study approach, this study conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants, including university deans, department heads, and faculty from three different Heilongjiang universities undergoing digital initiatives. The study aimed to uncover leadership strategies, challenges, and contextual factors that influence the success of educational technology integration. Thematic analysis of interview data revealed four major themes: 1) Vision and Strategic Planning: effective leaders set clear, shared goals for digital transformation and align technology use with institutional mission; 2) Professional Development and Support: leaders invest in continuous training, mentorship, and communities of practice to build faculty capacity for using technology; 3) Cultivating a Collaborative Culture: leaders foster an environment of trust and innovation, encouraging faculty experimentation with technology without fear of failure; 4) Resource Allocation and Incentives: leaders actively secure funding, infrastructure, and provide incentives to motivate faculty adoption of technology. Participants highlighted that leadership in this context also involves navigating national policies and local constraints. The findings illustrate a culturally nuanced picture of digital academic leadership, confirming that leadership approaches must address both human and technical aspects of change. This study contributes practical insights for university leaders and policymakers on guiding effective technology integration, and suggests a framework of leadership best practices tailored to higher education’s digital transformation in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: