Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Legal and Criminological PsychologyOpen Access

The impact of model statements on verbal differences between truth and lies when using a comparable truthful baseline

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GBGlynis BogaardNBNick J. BroersEMEwout H. Meijer

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Experiments assess verbal baselining's impact on truth/lie discrimination in different statements, indicating complexities in detection.

Key Points

  • Both model statements and baselines improved truth/lie discrimination in written statements, enhancing detection.
  • Experiment 1 showed significant effects of model statements, while Experiment 2 revealed inconsistent results in spoken statements.
  • Combining model statements with baselining did not yield additional benefits for truth/lie discrimination in either experiment.
  • Findings underscore the need for deeper understanding of verbal lie detection techniques and their effectiveness.

Cite This Study

Bogaard et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1925e9b7b07f3a06171c6https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70009
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated2019 · 154 citations
  2. 2Using an Example Statement Increases Information but Does Not Increase Accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN2013 · 54 citations
  3. 3Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools2010 · 56 citations
  4. 4Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars: The benefit of examining core and peripheral details.2018 · 28 citations
  5. 5Baselining as a Lie Detection Method2016 · 83 citations