Survey reveals significant awareness of AI tools among medical students, indicating a need for ethical guidance.
Objective: The objective of this study is to gauge the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Chat GPT use by medical students. Study design: A survey-based cross-sectional study. Study place and duration: The study was conducted at HBS Medical and Dental College over the span of three months (April 2024-June 2024). Methodology: A total of 190 medical students of 1st to Final Year MBBS were included in this study. A google form based validated questionnaire was filled and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Results: Most participants were aged 15–20 years (58.4%), most students became aware of ChatGPT through friends/family (45.8%) or the internet (39.5%). While students largely recognized its academic capabilities—such as paraphrasing (90.5%), generating essays (94.7%), interpreting data (85.3%), and solving complex problems (91.1%), fewer knew it could format references (64.2%) or conduct site-specific searches (60%). Although 60% trusted ChatGPT’s reliability, misconceptions persisted, such as the belief that it retrieves real-time data (67.9%). Ethical use was acknowledged by 78.4%, and most (89%) viewed such tools as the “new normal.” Despite low institutional guidance (22.1%) and minimal prohibition (13.1%), 60.6% verified its outputs, and 61.6% intended continued use. Conclusion: The advent of ChatGPT represents a transformative moment in the academic realm, particularly within medical education. This study highlights that although medical students are eagerly embracing AI tools, there is a pressing need for structured guidance, clear ethical standards, and stronger critical thinking abilities to ensure their responsible use
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zafar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: