Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrochemical analysis indicates enhanced specific capacitance in Ag-doped NiCo2O4, suggesting improved supercapacitor performance.
This study explores the hydrothermal synthesis of NiCo 2 O 4 and Ag‐doped NiCo 2 O 4 (Ag x Ni 1−x Co 2 O 4 , x = 0.0–0.5) electrodes as cost‐effective materials for supercapacitor applications. Electrochemical analysis of all fabricated materials was conducted using a half‐cell configuration, with measurements performed at various scan rates. As Ag concentration increased (for x ≤ 0.4), the specific capacitance also increased, reaching a maximum performance of 1501 F g −1 for x = 0.4. This represents a 2.5‐fold increase compared to its pristine counterpart. However, the specific capacitance value decreased by 21% when the Ag concentration was raised from x = 0.4 to x = 0.5. Performance decline is linked to the increment of pore size (20%) and the decrement in surface area (12%) in sample x = 0.5 compared to x = 0.4, as confirmed by BET analysis. Cyclic studies over 5000 cycles demonstrated retention capacities of 94% for x = 0 and 106% for x = 0.4. The x = 0.4 sample outperformed others, exhibiting the lowest solution‐resistance ( R s = 0.5 Ω) and charge transfer resistance ( R ct = 0.9 Ω). The sample with the best performance, x = 0.4, has been chosen for fabrication of a 2‐electrode system in both symmetric and asymmetric designs to evaluate device‐level performance. The symmetric supercapacitor (SSC) showed specific capacitance of approximately 252 F g −1 at current density of 1 A g −1 , maintaining 93.5% of its initial capacitance after 5000 cycles at 10 A g −1 . It delivered an energy density of 42 W h kg −1 at a power density of 549 W kg −1 . Meanwhile, the asymmetric supercapacitor showed specific capacitance (178 F g −1 at 1 A g −1 ), and retaining 105% capacitance after 5000 cycles at 10 A g −1 , with energy and power densities of 67 W h kg −1 , 853 W kg −1 , respectively. The findings from various characterization techniques are thoroughly analyzed to draw the structure–property–performance correlations and presented in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhashnamoorthy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: