Retrospective analysis shows transient declines in quality of life and function after flexor hallucis longus resection, suggesting preservation when possible.
Background The free fibula flap (FFF) is a gold standard for maxillofacial reconstruction, yet debate persists regarding the functional impact of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) resection. This study evaluates donor-site morbidity and quality of life (QoL) following FFF reconstruction, comparing outcomes with and without FHL resection. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted for 93 patients undergoing FFF reconstruction. Patients were stratified into FHL-harvested and non-FHL groups. Primary outcomes included QoL, AOFAS scores, hallux flexion strength, range of motion (ROM), isokinetic dynamometry, and gait analysis. Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 3- and 6-month intervals. Results The study cohort comprised 93 patients, with FHL harvested in 43 cases. The FHL group exhibited transient declines in QoL at 3 months, with partial recovery by 6 months. Both groups showed similar AOFAS score trajectories, with temporary declines at 3 months and near-complete recovery by 6 months. Hallux flexion strength decreased comparably in both groups at 3 months (FHL: −38%; non-FHL: −34%), with residual 18–20% deficits at 6 months. Isokinetic testing revealed transient plantar flexion weakness in the FHL group at higher velocities (90°/s: 54.2 ± 7.0 Nm vs. 58.6 ± 7.5 Nm pre-op, p=0.008), resolving by 6 months. Gait analysis demonstrated initial impairments in stride length and ankle ROM in the FHL group, normalizing by 6 months. Conclusion FHL resection during FFF harvest leads to transient functional and QoL impairments, but most deficits resolve within 6 months. Preservation is advisable when feasible, though FHL harvest remains safe for cases requiring additional soft tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: