Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research introduces the ToxicBias-Reasoning dataset for bias in language models, highlighting cultural diversity and reasoning generation.
Abstract Bias in language models refers to systematic unfairness toward social groups, making it essential to build datasets that capture such bias in diverse and multicultural contexts. Existing bias detection datasets are limited in cultural diversity, do not capture overlapping categories of bias, and rarely provide support for generating human-interpretable reasoning, which restricts their usefulness for responsible AI development. To address these gaps, we introduce the ToxicBias-Reasoning dataset with 7,562 statements (5639 biased, 1,923 non-biased), including a new Caste category (247 examples) and additional samples reflecting Indian cultural biases. Our key contributions are threefold: (1) we provide a high-quality dataset in which all classification labels are manually annotated, the reasoning test set is entirely manual, and the reasoning annotations for training and validation are generated through a GPT-4o–assisted human-in-the-loop pipeline, ensuring scalability while maintaining quality; (2) we establish strong baselines using transformer-based models (BERT, RoBERTa) under hierarchical and multitask configurations, where a logic-aware loss function is introduced to capture inter-label dependencies in the multilabel category classification task which improves macro-F1 for category-level prediction; and (3) we benchmark reasoning generation using a BART-Large model distilled from GPT-4o outputs, achieving a ROUGE-L of 45.22. These contributions offer the first comprehensive benchmark for interpretable and culturally inclusive bias detection with reasoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: