Experimentally validates a specialized LLM for hazard identification in construction, highlighting improved safety management practices.
With the recent revision of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the enforcement of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act, safety regulations have become more stringent, leading to a shortage of safety management personnel and increased documentation burdens on construction sites. This issue is especially severe at small- and medium-sized sites, where ensuring effective safety management is more challenging. In response, LLM-based task automation technologies have gained attention. However, general-purpose LLMs often lack the domain-specific knowledge needed for practical application in construction safety. To address this, the study develops an LLM specialized in identifying hazardous and harmful factors on construction sites by applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and fine-tuning methods. Experimental validation was conducted using OpenAI’s GPT model under three configurations: fine-tuning only, RAG only, and a combined fine-tuning + RAG approach. Performance was assessed through quantitative metrics (BLEU, ROUGE, BERT Score) and qualitative evaluations via user surveys. The combined approach showed the best performance, consistently outperforming general-purpose LLMs in all quantitative metrics and receiving the highest rating in the efficiency category of the qualitative evaluation. These results demonstrate that a domain-specialized LLM can significantly enhance hazard identification capabilities, supporting more effective safety management practices in construction. This study offers both academic and practical contributions by demonstrating a method for improving LLM performance in specialized domains and providing a technical foundation for automated tools in construction safety management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: