Quantitative analysis reveals birth order affects decision-making styles and self-efficacy, suggesting targeted training implications.
This study examines the influence of birth order on the decision-making styles and general self-efficacy of adults. Grounded in Alfred Adler's birth order theory and contemporary frameworks of cognitive decision-making, the research explores how one's ordinal position within the family is associated with preferred approaches to making decisions and overall confidence levels. Using a quantitative research design, data were collected from a purposive sample of 388 adults, with birth order, decision-making styles (rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, spontaneous), and general self-efficacy measured via validated scales. Findings reveal that firstborns report significantly higher levels of general self-efficacy and a stronger preference for a rational decision-making style, while lastborns show a greater propensity for an intuitive decision-making style. Mediation analysis indicates that self-efficacy partially explains the relationship between birth order (firstborn vs. lastborn) and rational decision-making. The study highlights that birth order functions as a probabilistic factor that shapes confidence, which in turn influences cognitive strategies for decision-making. Implications for organizational behavior, team composition, and personal development include leveraging innate strengths and designing targeted training to build complementary skills across different birth order profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jemima N. A. A. Lomotey (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: