Analysis reveals improved occupant protection and structural integrity in bolted armor designs under blast loading.
Today’s military armored vehicles have weak occupant protection against improvised explosive device (IED) impacts. This paper investigates a bolted armor vehicle body structure utilizing ultra-high-strength steel (UHSS) panels. Compared to traditional welded structures, this design enhances production efficiency and reduces manufacturing costs. This study conducted a 6 kg TNT underbody blast test on the aforementioned bolted vehicle body according to AEP-55 and NATO 4569 standards. A corresponding finite element model was established to simulate the 6 kg TNT underbody explosion. The simulation results, including structural failure locations and acceleration responses during the blast event, were compared with experimental data, validating the accuracy of the full-vehicle nonlinear model. The simulated structural failure locations and acceleration responses were compared with experimental results, validating the accuracy of the nonlinear full-vehicle model. Furthermore, the stress distribution of the bolted armor body (without additional mine-protection components), bolt stress-strain behavior, and failure modes were analyzed under underbody and side blast scenarios. Results indicate that under 2 kg TNT underbody blasts and 10 kg TNT side blasts, the bolts remained intact, but the panels reached their load-bearing limit. Thus, the proposed bolted armor body structure can effectively replace traditional welded designs. By employing higher-strength armor steel, it significantly enhances the survivability of combat personnel in battlefield environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: