Survey demonstrates variability in screening and management of pulmonary hypertension in neonates, highlighting the need for standardized protocols.
To describe national patterns in the screening, diagnosis, and clinical management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH) in Spanish neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and assess the need for standardized screening and management protocols and unified follow-up strategies. A 20-question electronic survey was distributed to all Level III NICUs in the Spanish public health system to evaluate practices in BPD-PH screening, diagnosis, and clinical management. Results were analyzed globally and by NICU level (IIIB vs. IIIC). A total of 47 NICUs (59% response rate) participated, with a complete (100%) response rate from Level IIIC units, which represent the highest complexity centers. Although 70% of units reported routine screening for BPD-PH, only 36% used formal screening protocols, revealing inconsistencies in timing and criteria. Diagnostic approaches relied heavily on echocardiographic indicators of pulmonary hypertension, particularly interventricular septal flattening, and right-to-left shunting, but adjunct tests (e.g., NT-proBNP, catheterization) varied between centers. Only 19% of NICUs-mostly Level IIIC-used standardized clinical management algorithms. Asymptomatic infants were typically managed with conservative strategies (oxygen targeting, fluid restriction), while sildenafil was the predominant therapy for symptomatic BPD-PH cases (80% of units). Follow-up protocols showed significant heterogeneity, especially in asymptomatic patients discharged without treatment. There is a clear need for national guidelines to address variability in screening protocols, diagnostic strategies, clinical management and follow-up practice of BPD-PH. Establishing uniform care standards across Spanish NICUs could improve equity and outcomes in this high-risk preterm population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García-Gozalo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: