Experimental analysis reveals children's temporal reasoning applies to real events, suggesting limitations for hypothetical situations.
Time words like ‘yesterday’ and ‘tomorrow’ are hard for children to learn, and for researchers to study, because their referents change from day to day. For example, ‘yesterday’ means something different on Monday and on Wednesday. This study tested 3- and 4-year-old (n = 121; 52% female) US and Canadian children’s understanding of ‘yesterday’ and ‘tomorrow’ using three tasks that differed in their reliance on autobiographical and hypothetical events. Results across two experiments conducted between 2023-2025 indicated that 3-year-olds comprehend ‘yesterday’ and ‘tomorrow’ when they applied to autobiographical events. However, when asked about hypothetical timelines, even some 4-year-olds struggled to demonstrate knowledge, suggesting that children’s early temporal reasoning may be limited to autobiographical events, and does not extend to hypothetical events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maheshwari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: