Abstract Background Disparities in cancer burden between transgender and cisgender individuals remain an underexplored area of research. Objective This study aimed to examine the cumulative incidence and associated risk factors for cancer and precancerous conditions among transgender individuals compared with matched cisgender individuals. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using patient-level electronic health record (EHR) data from the University of Florida Health Integrated Data Repository between 2012 and 2023. Transgender individuals were identified using a validated, computable phenotype algorithm that used structured data and clinical notes. They matched 1:10:10 by age and calendar year of index date with cisgender women and cisgender men. The index date was the first transgender-related record for transgender individuals and a matched diagnosis date for cisgender controls. Primary outcomes included new-onset cancers associated with human papillomavirus, human immunodeficiency virus, tobacco, alcohol, lung, breast, and colorectal sites. Secondary outcomes were precancerous conditions related to the same cancer types. We calculated cumulative incidence rates and conducted time-to-event analyses using the Fine-Gray method, treating all-cause death as a competing risk, to assess associations between gender identity and the presence of cancer or precancer, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Interaction analyses evaluated if associations between cancer risk factors and precancer differed by gender identity. Results We identified 2745 transgender individuals (mean age at index date 25.1, SD 14.0 years) and matched them with 27,450 cisgender women and 27,450 cisgender men from the same health care system. The cumulative incidence of cancer did not differ significantly between transgender and cisgender cohorts (transgender n=28, 1.0% vs cisgender women, n=358, 1.3%; P =.13 and cisgender men, n=314, 1.1%; P =.64). However, transgender individuals exhibited significantly higher risks for precancerous conditions compared to cisgender women (subdistribution hazard ratios sHRs 1.1, 95% CI 1.0‐1.3) and cisgender men (sHR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2‐1.5). Specifically, transgender individuals were more likely to develop colorectal precancer (sHR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1‐1.4) compared to cisgender women, as well as human papillomavirus–related precancer (sHR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4‐2.3) and colorectal precancer (sHR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2‐1.6) compared to cisgender men. Subgroup analyses showed similar patterns in both female-to-male and male-to-female individuals compared with their matched cisgender counterparts. Interaction analyses revealed stronger protective effects of private insurance or Medicare against precancers in transgender individuals than in cisgender peers, while being non-Hispanic Black or having substantial comorbidities were stronger risk factors among transgender individuals. Conclusions Transgender individuals showed a similar cancer incidence yet significantly higher precancer incidence compared with cisgender individuals, suggesting underdiagnosis or delayed detection. These findings highlight the need for tailored preventive care strategies, including targeted screenings and risk reduction interventions, to address cancer disparities in the transgender population.
Yang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.