Ecological momentary assessment reveals how emotion regulation affects stress and negative affect in individuals, highlighting its context-sensitive nature.
Emotion regulation difficulties are implicated in most psychopathologies, yet their everyday dynamics remain unclear. We adapted and validated the State Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (S-DERS) for ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and examined how such difficulties unfold in daily life. In a preregistered study (N = 214; 6 surveys/day for 10 days), participants reported on stressors, affect, and the S-DERS. Confirmatory analyses supported the S-DERS four-factor structure, with evidence against a general shared difficulty factor, and we provide validated 4-, 8-, and 18-item EMA versions with practical recommendations. Emotion regulation difficulties showed both stability and meaningful fluctuations, increasing after stressors, co-occurring with negative affect, and predicting impaired affective recovery. These effects were stronger among individuals high in trait DERS and neuroticism. Findings position emotion regulation difficulties as dynamic, context-sensitive processes that can be robustly measured in daily life to inform clinical science and intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sicorello et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: