Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals how financialization and a pyramid scheme in Kazakhstan illustrate illiberal economies, suggesting a complex economic interplay.
This article examines how the formal state‐centered economy and the informal economic sphere in Kazakhstan are enmeshed and intertwined. In analyzing these entanglements, I draw on Hayden and Muir's concept of “illiberal economies,” defined as alternative paradoxical spaces that are at once critical of formal economic institutions and also reliant on those institutions for procurement of value. I examine two illiberal economies, a state‐led financialization project and a pyramid scheme called “M‐Finance,” and demonstrate how the two were guided by similar logics and promoted by the same informal financial actors. I argue that the illiberal economy of M‐Finance was at once the product of state‐driven financialization and a critique of formal financial and political institutions. It was also a creative space for participants to pursue different forms of value, with financial value as primary. This case demonstrates how mainstream and alternative economies are interconnected and fueled by similar contradictions, aspirations, and imaginations of the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ainur Begim (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: