This article reveals how decision-making processes shape legal opinions in cases, suggesting alternatives to traditional dispute resolution methods.
This article proposes a formalization of the decision-making processes involved in legal controversies basedon the forms of interpretation of the judicial operator. It shows how such processes, both in easy and difficultcases, contribute to the formation of both indeterminate legal opinions and possible worlds in the studyof law. Ultimately, it aims to present a logical alternative to the traditional form of legal dispute resolution,grounded in syllogistic rules and bivalent structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jorge Enrique León Molina (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: