Comparative analysis evaluates real-time fraud detection in terms of latency and accuracy using CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM.
Abstract Real-time performance is a key indicator in the design of fraud detection systems. This study focuses on three gradient boosting algorithms (CatBoost, XGBoost and LightGBM) and evaluates their performance in real-time fraud detection scenarios in terms of prediction accuracy, inference latency, and resource consumption. The experiments were conducted on a simulated high-frequency trading environment with a data stream platform. The results showed that LightGBM was the most advantageous in latency control, while CatBoost provided more stable responses while maintaining accuracy. This study offers a reference for building efficient and deployable online fraud detection systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: