This research demonstrates impact resistance in steel-framed subassemblies, highlighting the role of deformation capacity and the influence of falling debris height.
Progressive collapse of building structures induced by accidental extreme loads has garnered significant attention. This study aimed to assess the impact resistance of steel-framed subassemblies with extended reverse channel connections under falling debris impact. It also sought to provide technical support for anti-collapse design. Drop-hammer impact tests were conducted to obtain baseline data. A validated finite element model using ANSYS/LS-DYNA was employed for the parametric analyses. The key parameters investigated included the impact location (mid-span vs. beam end), falling height of the impactor, and span-to-depth ratio of steel beams, with a focus on the impact resistance. The results reveal that the impact resistance depends on both the peak load capacity and the deformation capacity. The mid-span impacts exhibited higher resistance at falling heights ≥ 1.0 m due to greater plastic deformation. In contrast, the beam-end impacts performed better when the falling heights were ≤0.5 m. The impact resistance decreased with an increasing falling height. The reduction ratios exceeded the theoretical values due to the post-impact gravitational energy input. Smaller SDRs enhanced the peak resistance under both impact scenarios, with more pronounced effects in the mid-span cases. Catenary action significantly improved the mid-span impact resistance (19.3–66.7%). However, it contributed minimally to the beam-end impact resistance (0.61–1.09%), where shear action dominated. These findings offer critical technical support for optimizing steel structure designs to resist falling debris impact and enhance overall structural robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.