Observational study shows higher BUN/creatinine ratios are linked to sarcopenia in COPD patients, indicating poorer pulmonary function.
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major global health burden, often complicated by sarcopenia, a condition characterized by progressive muscle mass and strength loss. The blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to creatinine ratio, typically used to assess renal function, may serve as a marker for muscle wasting in COPD patients. This study investigates the association between the BUN/creatinine ratio and sarcopenia in COPD patients, alongside pulmonary function and inflammatory markers. Methods: A hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted at Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, India, from March 2023 to April 2024. A total of 120 COPD patients (aged >40 years, diagnosed per GOLD guidelines) were assessed. Sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-CaLF score, with scores ≥11 indicating sarcopenia. BUN and creatinine levels, pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, PaO2, PaCO2, SpO2). Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests, t-tests, and ANOVA to explore associations. Results: Sarcopenia was present in 33.3% of participants, with higher prevalence in severe (30.0%) and very severe (47.5%) COPD cases (p=0.003). The BUN/creatinine ratio was significantly higher in sarcopenic patients (29.25 ± 14.91 vs. 23.77 ± 10.26, p=0.030), driven by elevated BUN levels (16.79 ± 4.11 mg/dL vs. 15.14 ± 4.22 mg/dL, p=0.044). Sarcopenic patients exhibited poorer pulmonary function (lower FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, PaO2, SpO2; higher PaCO2, all p<0.05). No significant associations were found with sex or sociodemographic status. Conclusion: The BUN/creatinine ratio is significantly associated with sarcopenia in COPD patients, particularly in severe cases, and correlates with systemic inflammation and impaired pulmonary function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: