Machine learning algorithms predict UHPC tensile strength and highlight the importance of engineered features.
To explore a direct predictive model for the tensile strength of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), machine learning (ML) algorithms are presented. Initially, a database comprising 178 samples of UHPC tensile strength with varying parameters is established. Then, feature engineering strategies are proposed to optimize the robustness of ML models under a small-sample condition. Further, the performance and efficiency of algorithms are compared under default hyperparameters and hyperparameter tuning, respectively. Moreover, the utilization of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) enables the analysis of the relationships between UHPC tensile strength and its influencing factors. The quantitative analysis results indicate that ensemble algorithms exhibit superior performance, indicated by R2 values of above 0.92, under default hyperparameters. After hyperparameter tuning, both conventional and ensemble models achieve R2 values exceeding 0.94. However, Bayesian ridge regression (BRR) consistently demonstrates a suboptimal performance, irrespective of hyperparameter tuning. Notably, Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) requires a substantial duration of 1208 s, which is notably more time-consuming than that of other algorithms. The most influential feature identified is fiber reinforcement index with a contribution of 37.5%, followed by the water-to-cement ratio, strain rate, and cross-sectional size. The nonlinear relationship between UHPC tensile strength and the top four factors is visualized, and the critical thresholds are identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: