Observational study reveals improved overall survival in young adults with glioblastoma, indicating distinct biological characteristics.
Abstract Purpose.Glioblastomas, IDH- and H3-wildtype in young adults is a rare and poorly known entity. We compared newly diagnosed glioblastomas, IDH- and H3-wildtype in young adults (18–39 years) to those in adult patients (> 39 years).Methods.We performed an observational, retrospective, single-centre cohort study at a tertiary neurosurgical oncology centre between January 2006 and December 2022.Results.We included 1.139 adult patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH- and H3-wildtype. Young adults: 1) represent a small proportion of patients with glioblastoma, IDH- and H3-wildtype (n = 33, 2.9%); 2) have a high rate of unclassified cases according to WHO criteria and epigenetics (n = 10, 30.3%); 3) have a longer progression-free survival (p = 0.003) and overall survival (p = 0.001) and; 4) do not have higher surgically-related adverse event rates (p = 0.198). Concerning young adults, surgical resection was associated with improved progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The DNA-methylation class significantly impacts the overall survival (p = 0.028), however, the MGMT methylation status is not significantly associated with either progression-free or overall survival (p = 0.320 and p = 0.639, respectively).Conclusion.Glioblastomas, IDH- and H3-wildtype is a rare histo-molecular subtype in young adults with a better prognosis than older adults. In young adults, DNA-methylation subtypes are different from their adult counterpart and had a significant impact on survival unlike MGMT status. Given the rarity of glioblastoma IDH- and H3-wildtype in young adults, a dedicated management in specialized neurosurgical oncology centres is preferred. Further histo-molecular and epigenetic analyses are required to understand the differences in prognosis compared to adult patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roux et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: