Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals machine learning predicts diabetes risk using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, suggesting effective intervention measures.
Introduction This project intended to develop and validate a diabetes prediction model for high-risk populations based on machine learning algorithms. Material and methods A total of 2,355 samples from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database covering three cycles from 2013 to 2018 were included. The data were divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Nineteen risk prediction factors were selected as feature variables, including demographic baseline data, measurement data, medical history, and psychological health. Five machine learning models, including decision tree, random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), Adaboost, and XGBoost, Results The present work ultimately included 2,355 individuals at high risk of diabetes for analysis, with 260 cases of diabetes and 2,095 cases without diabetes. Among the five machine learning models established in this project, the RF and XGBoost models exhibited better overall performance compared to other models. In the test set, the RF model had an AUC of 0.896, accuracy of 0.784, sensitivity of 0.739, specificity of 0.849, and MCC of 0.418. The XGBoost model had corresponding values of AUC as 0.903, accuracy of 0.815, sensitivity of 0.962, and MCC of 0.443. According to the importance analysis of features in these two optimal models, waist circumference, age, BMI, gender Conclusions The RF and XGBoost models in machine learning demonstrate good performance in predicting the occurrence of diabetes in high-risk populations, which can aid in developing more precise intervention measures and personalized treatment plans to effectively reduce the incidence of diabetes and related risks in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: