Analysis uncovers how anger styles and personality traits mediate borderline personality traits with sexual self-schemas.
Aims: This study aims to examine the mediating role of anger styles and personality traits in the relationship between borderline personality traits and sexual self-schemas exhibited by individuals. Methods: In this study, 402 participants aged 18 and older (249 women and 153 men) completed the socio-demographic information form, the borderline personality scale, the sexual self-schema scale, and the state-trait anger expression inventory. The research employed the relational screening model. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 27 software. Results: According to the findings of the study, borderline personality traits were found to be negatively associated with loving/compassionate, sensual/stimulating, and direct/straightforward sexual self-schemas. There is a significant negative correlation between all sexual self-schemas and trait anger, including anger-in and anger-out behaviors. Similarly, a significant negative correlation was found between sexual self-schemas and borderline personality traits. On the other hand, there was a negative correlation between neuroticism, one of the five-factor personality traits, and sexual self-schemas, and a positive correlation between neuroticism and borderline personality traits. Furthermore, mediation analyses suggested that anger styles may function as a possible mechanism in the relationship between borderline personality traits and sexual self-schemas. Neuroticism was also identified as a potential mechanism in this relationship. Conclusion: Based on the findings from this study, borderline personality traits appear to be associated with lower levels of loving/compassionate, sensual/stimulating, and direct/straightforward sexual self-schemas. Anger styles and neuroticism, one of the five-factor personality traits, were also found to be potential mechanisms explaining this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
GÜLER et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: