Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals chloride exposure reduces load-bearing capacity in GFRP and steel-reinforced beams, indicating durability concerns.
The durability of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) bars is typically evaluated using accelerated conditioning protocols (ACP), which are applied to bar samples, either directly exposed or embedded in small concrete specimens, under aggressive environmental conditions. Thus, this study investigates the applicability of the ACPs recommended by ACI440.9R (2015), from the American Concrete Institute, to assess the potential effects of chloride exposure on reinforced concrete beams. Twelve beams—six reinforced with steel and six with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)—were tested under two scenarios: (1) a reference condition, with beams stored for 1000 h in a controlled laboratory environment, and (2) a conditioned condition, where beams were immersed in a 3.5% NaCl solution at 50 ± 3 °C for 1000 h prior to beam casting. After, the beams were evaluated through three-point bending tests, focusing on load–deflection behavior, failure modes, crack patterns, and strain distribution in concrete and reinforcement. The results indicated that chloride exposure adversely affected both steel and GFRP-reinforced beams. Steel-reinforced concrete beams exhibited a 12% reduction in load-bearing capacity due to steel corrosion, while the GFRP-reinforced concrete beams showed a 10% reduction in load-bearing capacity due to water absorption by the GFRP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazzú et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: