Purpose Hepatic fibrosis can be predicted using fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) scores. Functional liver imaging score (FLIS) provides valuable information regarding hepatic function. We aimed to assess whether easily obtained blood parameters (FIB-4 and FIB-5) may be used to discriminate preserved and impaired hepatic function based on FLIS. Material and methods Patients who underwent dynamic upper abdominal MRI with gadoxetic acid were retrospectively reviewed (n = 101, mean age 61.0 ± 11.3 years). FLIS values were categorized as FLIS < 4 (impaired hepatic function) and FLIS ≥ 4 (preserved hepatic function). The discriminative potential of FIB-4 and FIB-5 was assessed by plotting ROC curves. Results While FIB-4 was significantly higher, FIB-5 was significantly lower in patients with FLIS < 4. They had significant discriminative value in distinguishing patients with preserved and impaired hepatic function (area under the ROC curves 0.794 for FIB-4 and 0.748 for FIB-5, p-values < 0.001). Comparison of the area under the 2 ROC curves revealed that FIB-4 and FIB-5 had similar discriminative values (p = 0.405). For FIB-4, a cut-off value of 4.2 had a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 66.3%, PPV of 20.5%, and NPV of 98.4%, meaning that FIB-4 values of < 4.2 are valuable in ruling out FLIS < 4 (poor hepatic function). For FIB-5, a cut-off value of 36.2 had a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 60.9%, PPV of 18.2%, and NPV of 98.2%, meaning that FIB-5 values of > 36.2 are valuable in ruling out FLIS < 4. Conclusions FIB-4 and FIB-5 are valuable in discriminating preserved and impaired hepatic function based on FLIS scoring with similar diagnostic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kılıçkap et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: