Objective: To compare the efficacy and accuracy of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index with FibroScan in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Patel Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from October 2023 to April 2024. All known cases of NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) aged ≥18 years, regardless of gender, were included. FIB-4 scores were measured using age, platelet level, aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT). FibroScan categorized liver fibrosis into stages F0 to F4 with specific stiffness ranges: F0 (1–6 kPa), F1 (6.1–7 kPa), F2 (7.1–9 kPa), F3 (9.1–10.3 kPa), and F4 (≥10.4 kPa). Results: Of the 146 patients, the median age was 52.00 (IQR: 47.00–54.00) years. Based on FibroScan results, 61 (41.8%) patients were classified as F1, 35 (24.0%) as F2, 30 (20.5%) as F3, and 20 (13.7%) as F4. The diagnostic performance of FIB-4 showed an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76–0.90). The optimal cut-off for FIB-4 was 1.28 with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 98.0%, 65.6%, 59.7%, 98.4%, and 76.7%, respectively. Spearman's correlation test (ρ) was applied and a significantly moderate correlation was found between FibroScan and FIB-4 (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.001). Conclusion: FIB-4 demonstrated higher accuracy and diagnostic performance in determining liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients compared to FibroScan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kakar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: