Cross-sectional analysis highlights parents' beliefs and practices regarding corporal punishment in children, suggesting a need for awareness.
Introduction: Corporal punishment remains a public concern as it leads to short and long-term detrimental consequences on the victims.Objectives: To identify the parents’ beliefs, attitudes, and practices towards corporal punishment.Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted recruiting parents with primary school children in selected schools of Piliyandala Education zone, Western Province, Sri Lanka. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire and analysed using SPSS version 30.Results: This study involved 370 parents of whom 77.7% were female; 71.9% participants belonged to the 36–45-year age category. Current study revealed that 32.4% participants believed in corporal punishment in parenting and 25.4% believed that it is necessary in the school setting; 54% parents used corporal punishment on their children during the immediate one-month period prior to the study. More than 2/3rd participants had favourable attitudes against corporal punishment. Hand hitting (62%) was the commonest method employed by participants. Disobedience (26%) was the commonest reason that the parents practised corporal punishment; 61% participants learnt corporal punishment from their parents, while 40% learnt it from schools. Of all participants, 85.4% were aware of the negative consequences of corporal punishment; 93%) used at least one form of positive parenting strategy.Conclusions: This survey demonstrated that 54% participants used corporal punishment on their children during the one-month period immediately prior to study. There was no statistically significant association between the socio-demographic characteristics of the sample and the practice of corporal punishment on their children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hewamalage et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: