This preliminary study assesses multiplex pcr screening for E. coli and salmonella spp. in complex food matrices, revealing promising results.
Foodborne diseases are caused by various pathogens and generally present with similar symptoms, mainly digestive disorders. Adopting a syndromic approach is therefore important when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. This involves using multiplex PCR-based methods to test stool and food samples. In this study, the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel (BF-GIP) was evaluated as an alternative food microbiology method, in compliance with the ISO 16140-2 standard. We tested 205 naturally and artificially-contaminated mixed salad samples for Escherichia (E.) coli and Salmonella spp., comparing the results with BF-GIP and culture-based reference methods. For Salmonella spp., BF-GIP sensitivity was 100 % and the rate of false positives was 2.4 %, suggesting a good specificity. For E. coli, BF-GIP sensitivity was 92.9 %, with no significant difference from the reference method sensitivity. Shortcomings were highlighted for the accurate identification of E. coli strains artificially inoculated in food samples, with error percentages of 14 % and 9 % for the inclusivity and exclusivity studies respectively. BF-GIP is a suitable alternative method for the screening of Salmonella spp. and E. coli in complex food matrices, notably when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. However, due to a lack of specificity, the determination of the E. coli strain(s) needs to be confirmed by a reference method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watier-Grillot et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: