Pilot study finds blended learning improves skills and knowledge in health extension workers, suggesting a cost-effective training method.
Introduction This study addresses challenges in delivering in-service Integrated Refresher Training to 40 000 Health Extension Workers in rural Ethiopia. Through an offline multilingual mobile application, Extension Essentials, it aims to improve their knowledge and skills through a less costly blended learning approach combining in-person facilitation with offline digital self-learning. Methods In a pilot study from November 2021 to May 2022, a mixed-methods evaluation assessed knowledge, skills, satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness of training focused on Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health. Health Extension Workers and their supervisors were allocated by district into two groups: one receiving only conventional in-person training (conventional IRT control group) and the other using the mobile application for blended training (blended IRT treatment group). The evaluation utilized a quasi-experimental before-after matched comparison group design with 20 districts in the blended IRT treatment group study arm and 20 districts in the conventional IRT control group study arm. The blended IRT treatment group and conventional IRT control group sites were selected in consultation with the Ministry of Health using convenience sampling and matched based on location, population size, and health infrastructure. Findings Data showed learners engaged with the mobile app for an average of 2.8 hours per day (more than expected 2 hours) during self-learning, with high completion rates for activities (95%) and quizzes (88%). Learner knowledge scores improved significantly more from pre- to post-training in the blended IRT treatment group as compared to the conventional IRT control group (adjusted difference-in-differences: 2.01 percentage points, p = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.8–3.2), though the difference was not programmatically meaningful, indicating that both training modalities were similarly effective at improving knowledge. Skills assessment scores improved significantly in the blended IRT treatment group from 60% pre-training to 90% post-training (p < 0.001). There was no skill assessment conducted for the conventional IRT control group. Additionally, the blended approach reduced recurring training costs by 39% as compared to the conventional training. Conclusion Findings indicate that the Extension Essentials effectively enhances training through a flexible, user-friendly platform that addresses connectivity barriers and costs less than traditional methods, while yielding similar knowledge outcomes. Blended learning solutions are vital for scaling healthcare training in remote settings, warranting research on long-term impacts and broader applicability. Lay Summaries This study focuses on improving the training of Health Extension Workers (HEWs) in rural Ethiopia. With over 40 000 HEWs providing essential healthcare services in remote areas, traditional in-person training can be challenging to deliver. To address this, a new mobile application called Extension Essentials (EE) was developed for the HEWs to support self-paced, offline learning in local languages. A pilot study was conducted from November 2021 to May 2022 in 20 districts, comparing HEWs who received traditional face-to-face training with those who used the EE application as part of a blended learning approach. Results showed that HEWs using the EE application spent an average of 2.8 hours on self learning per day, exceeding expectations, and demonstrated improved practical skills. Supervisors found the app-generated reports valuable for planning post-training follow-up visits. Furthermore, the blended learning approach was 39% more cost-effective than traditional methods. In conclusion, the EE app offers an effective and affordable way to enhance HEWs’ training in rural areas, making learning more flexible and accessible. It helps improve knowledge and skills while reducing training costs and in-person time. This approach could be an important step in scaling up healthcare training in rural and remote areas, and further studies are needed to explore its long-term impacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asmamaw et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: