This analysis explores Arendt's 'concentration camp form' in relation to contemporary asylum-seekers, highlighting Boochani’s critique.
Hannah Arendt’s thought in relation to the emergence of concentration camps in the twentieth century can be seminal for understanding the rightlessness of prospective migrants and asylum-seekers in the twenty-first. In this paper I seek to clearly delineate Arendt’s ‘concentration camp form’ and apply it to a near-contemporary case of mandatory immigration detention – one with loud echoes for an apparently growing number of ‘democratic’ and ‘autocratic’ nation states which are constructing a global concentrationary universe in which essentially innocent and rightless people are incarcerated and punished on a group basis rather than for criminal wrongdoing as traditionally understood. The case is the literary testimony of Behrouz Boochani in his 2018 book No Friend But the Mountains. Boochani’s is a powerful contemporary voice testifying about and critiquing the practice of mandatory immigration detention by liberal democracies. The paper attempts an intertextual reading of Boochani’s and Arendt’s writings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Gray (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: