Cross-sectional analysis highlights the link between vitamin D levels and respiratory infections in children, suggesting early diagnosis is crucial.
Background: Respiratory infections are the major source of morbidity and mortality in children, especially in developing nations. Vitamin D has been proven to be a vital component in the functionality of the immune system and its deficiency has been associated with greater vulnerability to respiratory infections. Objectives: to investigate the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and the recurrent respiratory infections in children who are below the age of five. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study Conducted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar,jan to june-2023. Two hundred children between the ages of 6 months and 5 years old who had a history of recurrent respiratory infections were recruited. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were to be determined by blood samples. Information on the number of respiratory infections, medical history, and demographic was also collected. Results: The Study discovered that in the case of 60% of children, there was vitamin D deficiency (serum level less than 20 ng/mL). There was a higher prevalence of recurrent respiratory infections in children who had a vitamin D deficiency and 75% had more than three respiratory infections per year as compared to 45% of vitamin D adequate children. The correlation between the lack of vitamin D and frequent respiratory infections was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is very common in children below the age of five and is linked to high incidence of recurrent respiratory infections. These results indicate that early diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency may be critical and supplementation may prove effective in alleviating the cost of respiratory diseases among this group of vulnerable populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: