Cross-sectional risk analysis identifies factors influencing survival in SARS CoV 2, suggesting interventions using AI can enhance health security.
A major problem with healthcare administration is the ability to accurately quantify threats to health security−in real time. Here, a cross-sectional risk analysis for Covid -19 was performed using an online biological defense, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm. Risk of surviving SARS CoV 2 contagion was quantified and assigned a unit based on the Biological Agents index (BAI) using the following variables for Pareto analysis: morbidity, mortality, population density, viral infection dose in half the population (ID50), economic indicators and modes of transmission. Results show survival for SARS CoV 2 is independent of person to person and or environment to person transmission. Rather, survival is dependent on human behavior. The benefit here is that this protocol can provide evidence-based science needed to identify appropriate mitigation and benchmark for use by governments, non-governmental, humanitarian, international affairs, medical and public policy professionals, journalists, and scholars—at all levels, for use in planning, finance and evaluation of performance to justify budgets when combating global contagion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nzedegwu Olisa (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: