Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN)Open Access

Preserved built heritage assessment as dead or living: An assessment study regarding built heritage safeguarding approaches in Erbil

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MAMohamed Yahya Mohamed Al-BarzngySalahaddin University-ErbilMKMahmood Ahmed Bakr Khayat

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Fieldwork reveals dead heritage approach dominates in Erbil, highlighting needs for living heritage strategies.

Key Points

  • Local preservation strategies can be recognized as a dead heritage approach, limiting cultural vitality.
  • Statistical analysis of 222 samples shows a significant discrepancy between observed practices and recommended methods.
  • A comprehensive review identified and categorized preservation methods into dead and living heritage approaches.
  • Endorsing living heritage preservation is critical to safeguard traditional sectors and their built heritage.

Cite This Study

Al-Barzngy et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c19ab49b7b07f3a061c648https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10.i6.916
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating Deterioration Causes and Defect Patterns in Heritage Buildings: A Comprehensive Analytical Approach2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Evaluating the Viability of the Erbil Citadel Houses for Adaptive Reuse Process2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Erbil Citadel as a Brand for the City, the Role of Residents Awareness and Perceptions2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Erbil Citadel as a Brand for the City, The Role of Residents Awareness and Perceptions2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Preserving heritage for Iraqi cities: Urban modernization approaches according to expert opinions2025 · 2 citations