Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis measures enamel microhardness in teeth treated with bleaching agents, indicating minimal impact.
Background: Tooth bleaching is widely used for aesthetic enhancement, but it may negatively affect enamel integrity, particularly microhardness. Objective: To evaluate the micro hardness of the enamel of the tooth by comparing two different bleaching agents. Methodology: This experimental in vitro study was conducted over six months using 60 extracted human permanent teeth (100%). Teeth free from caries, structural defects, or prior treatment were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 30 each), further split into control and experimental subgroups (n = 20 each). One group was treated with 22% carbamide peroxide and the other with 37.5% hydrogen peroxide following standardized protocols. All specimens were stored in artificial saliva between treatments to simulate oral conditions. Enamel microhardness was measured at baseline, 24 hours, 7 days, and 14 days using the Vickers Hardness Test. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant. Results: In the carbamide peroxide group, the experimental subgroup showed a reduction in microhardness from 387.775 ± 26.028 initially to 381.375 ± 48.265 on day 7, with partial recovery to 387.575 ± 29.582 by day 14. The hydrogen peroxide group exhibited identical values across all time points. All within-group and between-group comparisons were statistically significant (p = 0.000), though the magnitude of difference was minimal. Conclusion: Both bleaching agents caused a slight, reversible reduction in enamel microhardness, with no significant difference between them under in vitro conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qazi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: