Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke associated with high morbidity and mortality. While neurosurgical evacuation may offer theoretical benefits, its impact on survival and hospital course remains debated. We aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical versus conservative management in patients with lobar, capsulo-lenticular, and thalamic ICH and to identify factors influencing mortality and the surgical decision. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted to the County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu (2017–2023) with spontaneous supratentorial ICH confirmed via CT (deepest affected structure determining lobar, capsulo-lenticular, or thalamic location). We collected data on demographics, clinical presentation (Glasgow Coma Scale GCS, anticoagulant use), hematoma characteristics (volume, extension), treatment modality (surgical vs. conservative), and in-hospital outcomes (mortality, length of stay). Statistical analyses included t-tests, χ2, correlation tests, and logistic regression to identify independent predictors of mortality and surgery. Results: A total of 445 patients were analyzed: 144 lobar, 150 capsulo-lenticular, and 151 thalamic. Surgical intervention was more common in patients with larger volumes and lower GCS. Overall, in-hospital mortality varied by location, reaching 13% in the lobar group, 20.7% in the capsulo-lenticular group, and 35.1% in the thalamic group. Within each location, surgical intervention did not significantly reduce overall in-hospital mortality despite the more severe baseline presentation in surgical patients. In lobar ICH specifically, no clear survival advantage emerged, although surgery may still benefit those most severely compromised. For capsulo-lenticular hematomas > 30 mL, surgery was associated with lower mortality (39.4% vs. 61.5%). In patients with large lobar ICH, surgical intervention was associated with mortality rates similar to those seen in less severe, conservatively managed cohorts. Multivariable adjustment confirmed GCS and hematoma volume as independent mortality predictors; age and volume predicted the likelihood of surgical intervention. Conclusions: Despite targeting more severe cases, neurosurgical evacuation did not uniformly lower in-hospital mortality. In lobar ICH, surgical patients with larger hematomas (~48 mL) and lower GCS (~11.6) had mortality rates (~13%) comparable to less severe, conservative cohorts, indicating that surgical intervention was associated with similar mortality rates despite higher baseline risk. However, these findings do not establish a causal survival benefit and should be interpreted in the context of non-randomized patient selection. For capsulo-lenticular hematomas > 30 mL, surgery was associated with lower observed mortality (39.4% vs. 61.5%). Thalamic ICH remained most lethal, highlighting the difficulty of deep-brain bleeds and frequent ventricular extension. Across locations, hematoma volume and GCS were the primary outcome predictors, indicating the need for timely intervention, better patient selection, and possibly minimally invasive approaches. Future prospective multicenter research is necessary to refine surgical indications and validate these findings. To our knowledge, this investigation represents the largest and most contemporary single-center cohort study of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage conducted in Romania.
Cindea et al. (Wed,) studied this question.