Systematic review shows elevated thyroid autoantibodies in PCOS women, suggesting autoimmune risk, highlighting the influence of TSH and BMI.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex condition affecting women of reproductive age, characterized by menstrual irregularities, hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovarian morphology, and low-grade inflammation accompanied by oxidative stress and increased autoimmune risk, particularly Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Many studies have examined thyroid autoantibodies—anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies (anti-TPO) and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (anti-TG)—in PCOS; however, observed differences in baseline thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and body mass indices (BMIs) impede a direct interpretation of the results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the available evidence on the prevalence and levels of anti-TPO and anti-TG in women with PCOS. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, which yielded 40 eligible, observational studies including 6045 women with PCOS and 4527 controls. Subgroup analyses were conducted separately for TSH- and BMI-matched populations. Anti-TPO prevalence (odds ratio [OR] = 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35–3.04; p = 0.0006) and levels (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.37–0.88; p < 0.00001) were significantly higher in PCOS patients. Anti-TG prevalence (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.23–3.01; p = 0.004) and levels (SMD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.18–0.64; p = 0.0004) were also significantly elevated. In matched subgroups, prevalence differences were no longer significant, though anti-TPO levels remained significantly elevated and anti-TG levels were borderline significant in the TSH-matched subgroup of PCOS women. Although differences in thyroid autoantibody prevalence in women with PCOS appear to be driven by elevated TSH levels and BMIs, the persistently increased antibody levels in the majority of matched subgroups suggest that PCOS itself may contribute independently to heightened autoimmune activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwiatkowski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: