This study investigates drug elimination in Sprague-Dawley rats, revealing fecal excretion as the primary pathway.
Background/Objectives: The novel compound 221s (2,9), derived from danshensu and ACEI-active proline, exhibits antihypertensive effects (50/35 mmHg SBP/DBP reduction in SHRs) with potential cough mitigation. However, its excretion kinetics remain unstudied. This study investigates 221s (2,9) elimination in rats to bridge this knowledge gap. Methods: Excretion of unchanged 221s (2,9) was quantified in urine, feces, and bile of Sprague-Dawley rats after oral administration (30 mg/kg). Concentrations of unchanged 221s (2,9) in all matrices were quantified using developed UPLC-MS/MS that underwent methodological validation. Excretion amount, excretion velocity, and accumulative excretion rate of 221s (2,9) were calculated. Results: Urinary excretion exhibited rapid elimination kinetics, reaching peak cumulative excretion rates (138.81 ± 15.56 ng/h) at 8 h post-dosing and plateauing by 48 h (cumulative excretion: 1479.81 ± 155.7 ng). Fecal excretion displayed an accelerated elimination phase between 4 and 8 h (excretion rate: 7994.29 ± 953.75 ng/h), followed by a sustained slow-release phase, culminating in a cumulative output of 36,726.31 ± 5507 ng at 48 h. Biliary excretion was minimal and ceased entirely by 24 h. Notably, total recovery of unchanged drug across all matrices remained below 1% (urine: 0.020 ± 0.021%; feces: 0.73 ± 0.069%; bile: 0.00044 ± 0.00002%) at 72 h. Conclusions: This study provides the first definitive excretion data for 221s (2,9). Quantitative analysis via a validated UPLC-MS/MS method revealed that fecal excretion is the principal elimination pathway for unchanged 221s (2,9) in rats, with direct excretion of the parent compound accounting for <1% of the administered dose over 72 h. Future studies will employ extended pharmacokinetic monitoring and concurrent UPLC-MS/MS analysis of the parent drug and phase II conjugates to resolve the observed mass imbalance and elucidate contributions to total elimination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: