Analysis shows Naples prognostic score predicts disease-free survival in cervical cancer patients, suggesting clinical value.
Background and Objectives: The Naples prognostic score (NPS), which incorporates inflammatory and nutritional indicators, is increasingly used as a prognostic score for various malignancies. Nonetheless, few studies have specifically evaluated the NPS as a prognostic factor for cervical cancer. This study aimed to assess the value of NPS at diagnosis as a predictor of cancer progression. Materials and Methods: This study included patients diagnosed with cervical cancer at Korea University Anam Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients with incomplete data or those who were lost to follow-up were excluded. The NPS was calculated based on laboratory results at the time of diagnosis, categorizing patients into the low-NPS group (NPS 0-1) and high-NPS group (NPS ≥ 2). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: Out of 178 patients, 98 and 80 were categorized into the low-NPS and high-NPS groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the high-NPS group had significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02) rates than the low-NPS group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the NPS as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.98; p = 0.017), but not for OS. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the NPS measured at diagnosis may serve as a useful independent prognostic factor for cancer progression in patients with cervical cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: