Rhetorical analysis reveals a transition from crisis management tactics to accountability in BP's leadership communication post-2010 oil spill.
The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill precipitated one of the most severe environmental and reputational crises in corporate history. BP’s initial crisis‑phase communications under CEO Tony Hayward were marked by denial, minimization, and ill‑timed personal remarks, which exacerbated public outrage. Following Hayward’s replacement by Bob Dudley, BP’s leadership rhetoric shifted toward mortification, corrective action, and bolstering, coupled with concrete safety reforms and compensation commitments. Drawing on Situational Crisis Communication Theory and image‑repair frameworks, this study conducts a rhetorical analysis of English‑language speeches, press releases, CSR reports, and interviews from April 2010 through late 2011. Findings reveal a clear transition from defensive tactics (denial, evasion) to restorative strategies (apology, accountability, reform) that gradually stabilized BP’s public image. The study contributes to crisis communication scholarship by mapping how leadership rhetoric evolves to rebuild trust and legitimacy following a major corporate transgression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiaolan Zheng (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: