Computational analysis reveals hydraulic resistance variations in microchannels, suggesting design optimizations.
This study presents a three‐dimensional computational analysis of inertial flow behaviour, hydraulic resistance, and thermodynamic performance in asymmetrical converging–diverging microchannels. Three configurations are examined by introducing asymmetries in the lower arm—through variations in tapering angle, throat width, and throat length—while keeping the upper arm unchanged. Flow distribution analysis reveals that the steep‐angle design achieves the most balanced flow split, improving symmetry by approximately 55% and 83% compared to the extended‐throat and wide‐throat designs, respectively. At a representative flow rate of 20 μL/min, the wide‐throat configuration exhibits the lowest flow resistance, reducing pressure drop by 46.7% and 28.0% relative to the extended‐throat and steep‐angle cases, respectively. The steep‐angle design also outperforms the extended‐throat geometry by 26.0%. In terms of thermodynamic performance, entropy generation is lowest in the steep‐angle configuration, showing a 27% reduction compared to the extended‐throat case for Re 2.82. Overall, the wide‐throat design minimizes energy loss and hydraulic resistance, the steep‐angle configuration offers a balanced trade‐off between flow symmetry and efficiency, and the extended‐throat geometry results in the highest pressure and entropy penalties. These findings offer quantitative guidance for the optimized design of energy‐efficient microfluidic systems operating under inertial flow regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: