Comparative analysis of peak detection algorithms in FMCW radar systems shows CA-CFAR excels in phase noise resilience, indicating LTSP's increased robustness.
Accurate peak detection in the frequency domain is fundamental to reliable range estimation in Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) radar systems, particularly in challenging conditions characterized by a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and phase noise impairments. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of five peak detection algorithms: FFT thresholding, Cell-Averaging Constant False Alarm Rate (CA-CFAR), a simplified Matrix Pencil Method (MPM), SVD-based detection, and a novel Learned Thresholded Subspace Projection (LTSP) approach. The proposed LTSP method leverages singular value decomposition (SVD) to extract the dominant signal subspace, followed by signal reconstruction and spectral peak analysis, enabling robust detection in noisy and spectrally distorted environments. Each technique was analytically modeled and extensively evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations across a wide range of SNRs and oscillator phase noise levels, from −100 dBc/Hz to −70 dBc/Hz. Additionally, real-world validation was performed using a custom-built harmonic FMCW radar prototype operating in the 2.4–2.5 GHz transmission band and 4.8–5.0 GHz harmonic reception band. Results show that CA-CFAR offers the highest resilience to phase noise, while the proposed LTSP method delivers competitive detection performance with improved robustness over conventional FFT and MPM techniques. Furthermore, the hardware feasibility of each algorithm is assessed for implementation on a Xilinx FPGA platform, highlighting practical trade-offs between detection performance, computational complexity, and resource utilization. These findings provide valuable guidance for the design of real-time, embedded FMCW radar systems operating under adverse conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Awamry et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: