Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consensus diagnoses show 88% agreement in participants across multiple sites, indicating strong inter-rater reliability.
The Asian Cohort for Alzheimer's Disease (ACAD) study is a collaborative investigation of genetic and non-genetic risk factors for AD among Asian Americans and Canadians. Harmonization of diagnostic procedures across recruiting sites will be key to the dataset's efficacy. Forty-two participants who completed the consensus process across seven ACAD recruiting sites were re-reviewed by two further impartial raters. Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate inter-rater agreement. The findings reveal the highest level of observed agreement at 88% and a Cohen's Kappa of 0.835, among site consensus participants and two levels of external review, affirming the reliability of our protocol. ACAD has developed a data collection and diagnostic process that allows consistency among sites that serve Asians speaking Korean, Chinese, and Vietnamese languages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alkhodair et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: