A deep learning approach measures building height from panoramic street view images, suggesting enhanced urban planning applications.
Building height information plays an important role in many urban-related applications, such as urban planning, disaster management, and environmental studies. With the rapid development of real scene maps, street view images are becoming a new data source for building height estimation, considering their easy collection and low cost. However, existing studies on building height estimation primarily utilize remote sensing images, with little exploration of height estimation from street-view images. In this study, we proposed a deep learning-based method for estimating the height of a single building in Baidu panoramic street view imagery. Firstly, the Segment Anything Model was used to extract the region of interest image and location features of individual buildings from the panorama. Subsequently, a cross-view matching algorithm was proposed by combining Baidu panorama and building footprint data with height information to generate building height samples. Finally, a Two-Branch feature fusion model (TBFF) was constructed to combine building location features and visual features, enabling accurate height estimation for individual buildings. The experimental results showed that the TBFF model had the best performance, with an RMSE of 5.69 m, MAE of 3.97 m, and MAPE of 0.11. Compared with two state-of-the-art methods, the TBFF model exhibited robustness and higher accuracy. The Random Forest model had an RMSE of 11.83 m, MAE of 4.76 m, and MAPE of 0.32, and the Pano2Geo model had an RMSE of 10.51 m, MAE of 6.52 m, and MAPE of 0.22. The ablation analysis demonstrated that fusing building location and visual features can improve the accuracy of height estimation by 14.98% to 69.99%. Moreover, the accuracy of the proposed method meets the LOD1 level 3D modeling requirements defined by the OGC (height error ≤ 5 m), which can provide data support for urban research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: