Randomized control trial evaluated HIIT's effects on physical health and quality of life in breast cancer survivors, suggesting long-term benefits.
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of a remotely supervised HIIT program implemented during six months NACT on quality of life (QoL) and physical health outcomes in women with breast cancer, assessed 18–24 months post-intervention. The HIIT intervention study was two arm randomized control trial implementing remotely supervised 4x4 min training at an intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate for 6 months during NACT. Physical health was assessed by treadmill VO 2peak , 6MWT and sit-to-stand test, and QoL by the EORTC QoL30. Participants were 24 BC survivors who agreed to participate in follow-up 18-24 months after the intervention (HIIT= 13, CG = 11). Results: At follow-up, the HIIT group demonstrated significant difference in change of VO 2peak (p = .046, ES = .169) and time to exhaustion (p = .024, ES= .211). Both groups presented significantly higher 6MWT and sit to stand test results at follow-up compared to pre-NACT (p < .05), while the magnitude of change was not significant. HIIT group results demonstrated moderate associations between 6MWT and Physical Functioning (r = −.674, p = .012) and Emotional Functioning (− .567, p = .043). A remotely supervised 6-months HIIT during NACT showed positive effects on submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness, absolute VO 2peak and muscle strength at 18-24 months follow-up. Moderate negative association between 6MWT and perceived physical and emotional functioning highlighted the complex relationship between physiological outcomes and self-reported QoL. The HIIT can be recommended during NACT to maintain prolonged effects on physical health of BC survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kļaviņa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: