Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical discourse analysis uncovers radical right MEPs' arguments against EU press freedom regulations, indicating normalization of their agenda.
The radical right is now able to impose its personnel and its agenda as the ‘new normal’ for a different European Union (EU). Nevertheless, there is still a lack of research into how this normalization is circulated by radical-right members of the European Parliament (MEPs), eager to be part of the social world of the liberal democratic European parliamentarians. This process of normalization is investigated in this article by carrying out a critical discourse analysis of the argumentation used by radical-right MEPs to reject an EU regulation supposed to preserve press freedom, currently threatened by the radical right in many EU member states: the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA). The analysis shows that these MEPs have been keen to use a series of topoi to claim their embeddedness in liberal democracies, while mobilizing symbols and meanings revealing their autocratic roots and their willingness to redefine media freedom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christian Lamour (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: