What type of study is this?

September 10, 2025BMC SurgeryOpen Access

The efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endo-laparoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

One-stage laparoscopic management resulted in significant cost savings of $2,046 per patient compared to two-stage management.
Procedural failure rates were lower for one-stage management at 4%, compared to 8% for two-stage management in patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.
One-stage laparoscopic approach had a longer median duration of 155 minutes compared to 95 minutes for the two-stage approach.
Hospital stay was similar for both management approaches, with a median of 3 days, indicating efficiency for both methods.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Analysis reveals one-stage laparoscopic management reduces costs and demonstrates comparable effectiveness in CCL cases, suggesting its viability over two-stage strategies.

Cite This Study

Anwar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a13354b1d3bfb60dc857 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03094-2

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Analysis reveals one-stage laparoscopic management reduces costs and demonstrates comparable effectiveness in CCL cases, suggesting its viability over two-stage strategies.

The efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endo-laparoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

The efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endo-laparoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider